There's a legal maneuver known as the Alford plea in which a criminal defendant does not admit the act and asserts innocence, but admits that sufficient evidence exists with which the prosecution could likely convince a judge or jury to find the defendant guilty. Upon receiving an Alford plea from a defendant, the court may immediately pronounce the defendant guilty and impose sentence as if the defendant had otherwise been convicted of the crime.
In Iowa, the Alford plea has new meaning following the departure of Hawkeye men's basketball coach Steve Alford for the University of New Mexico. The move allows Stevie Wonder, as I've derisively taken to calling him, to save face without admitting his many coaching failures. It also spares Athletics Director Gary Barta the eventual task of casting judgment on the tenure of the Indiana golden boy.
I confess that I was an early proponent of Alford. I even sent an e-mail to then-Athletics Director Bob Bowlsby -- which I mistakenly sent to all of the employees of the company where I was working at the time -- encouraging him to send the likable Tom Davis packing and hire the hot coaching prospect out of Southwest Missouri State.
But that was eight years ago. A lot of things have happened over that time to change my perspective of the man hired to take Iowa basketball to the next level, not the least of which is that he didn't. One NCAA tournament victory in eight years. A losing record in regular season Big 10 games. Pierre Pierce.
This is not what anyone imagined the next level would look like.
Sure, he won two Big 10 Tournaments and had a school-record seven straight winning seasons, but he never endeared himself to the same Iowa fans who cheered his arrival. His approval ratings would mirror those of George Bush following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks -- universal support squandered.
Laking professional teams, Iowa's Division I sports programs are subject to intense scrutiny. Alford was subject to so many rumors, it's impossible to say if any were valid. But I'm inclined to believe that most rumors have some basis in reality, such as the repeatedly denied rumor that New Mexico was courting Alford.
Regardless, Alford is clearly a confident man. There's nothing wrong with that, necessarily, unless confidence is read as cockiness or arrogance by the fan base. Worse yet if your performance doesn't measure up to your self esteem.
I wish Alford nothing but the best in New Mexico, but I'm glad he's gone. I have no intention of expressing my views to the Iowa AD about who the next coach should be. I only hope lessons learned from the Alford era will value substance over style.
Saturday, March 24, 2007
[+/-] |
The Alford plea: Iowa style |
Thursday, March 22, 2007
[+/-] |
What Seattle Has Taught Us |
It is too possible for everything to be uphill from everything else. In both directions.
16-year-old boys can have a patisserie habit.
Your hair will do that thing. No. matter. what. you. try.
There is no Italian food here.
Or ice cream.
However, Potatoes, Idaho. $7 is an acceptable menu choice.
Denial may be a powerful force, but just because they deny it's raining doesn't mean they're not wet.
Monorail!
If alcohol doesn't cure what ails you, something fried with cinnamon and sugar will.
Jimmy Hendrix had lovely penmanship. And then he died.
[+/-] |
RIP: Calvert DeForest, aka Larry "Bud" Melman |
Calvert DeForest, the white-haired, bespectacled nebbish who gained cult status as the oddball Larry ``Bud'' Melman on David Letterman's late night television shows, has died after a long illness.
The Brooklyn-born DeForest, who was 85, died Monday at a hospital on Long Island, Letterman's ``Late Show'' announced Wednesday.
He made dozens of appearances on Letterman's shows from 1982 through 2002, handling a variety of twisted duties: dueting with Sonny Bono on ``I Got You, Babe,'' doing a Mary Tyler Moore impression during a visit to Minneapolis, handing out hot towels to arrivals at the Port Authority Bus Terminal.
``Everyone always wondered if Calvert was an actor playing a character, but in reality he was just himself -- a genuine, modest and nice man,'' Letterman said in a statement. ``To our staff and to our viewers, he was a beloved and valued part of our show, and we will miss him.''
The gnomish DeForest was working as a file clerk at a drug rehabilitation center when show producers, who had seen him in a New York University student's film, came calling.
He was the first face to greet viewers when Letterman's NBC show debuted on Feb. 1, 1982, offering a parody of the prologue to the Boris Karloff film ``Frankenstein.''
``It was the greatest thing that had happened in my life,'' he once said of his first Letterman appearance.
DeForest, given the nom de tube of Melman, became a program regular. The collaboration continued when the talk show host launched ``Late Show with David Letterman'' on CBS in 1993, though DeForest had to use his real name because of a dispute with NBC over ``intellectual property.''
Cue cards were often DeForest's television kryptonite, and his character inevitably appeared in an ill-fitting black suit behind thick black-rimmed glasses.
DeForest often drew laughs by his bizarre juxtaposition as a ``Late Show'' correspondent at events such as the 1994 Winter Olympics in Norway or the anniversary Woodstock concert that year.
His last appearance on ``Late Show,'' celebrating his 81st birthday, came in 2002.
DeForest also appeared in an assortment of other television shows and films, including ``Nothing Lasts Forever'' with Bill Murray and Dan Aykroyd.
At his request, there will be no funeral service for DeForest, who left no survivors.
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
[+/-] |
I love Wisconsin, but seriously! |
They love to hunt in Wisconsin, perhaps too much, at least in the case of this disturbed young man in a wire story today. Come to think of it, that hermaphrodite deer story from a while back was also in Wisconsin. Coincidence?
SUPERIOR, Wis. (AP) -- A 20-year-old Superior man received probation after he was convicted of having sexual contact with a dead deer.
The sentence also requires Bryan James Hathaway to be evaluated as a sex offender and treated at the Institute for Psychological and Sexual Health in Duluth, Minn.
"The state believes that particular place is the best to provide treatment for the individual," Assistant District Attorney Jim Boughner said.
Hathaway's probation will be served at the same time as a nine-month jail sentence he received in February for violating his extended supervision.
He was found guilty in April 2005 of felony mistreatment of an animal after he killed a horse with the intention of having sex with it. He was sentenced to 18 months in jail and two years of extended supervision on that charge as well as six years of probation for taking and driving a vehicle without the owner's consent.
Hathaway pleaded no contest earlier this month to misdemeanor mistreatment of an animal for the incident involving the deer. He was sentenced Tuesday in Douglas County Circuit Court.
"The type of behavior is disturbing," Judge Michael Lucci said. "It's disturbing to the public. It's disturbing to the court."
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
[+/-] |
4 years wasted and 3,217 dead |
As we mark the fourth anniversary of war in Iraq, the central question remains unanswered. Why?
This post doesn't answer that question, but it reminds us how terribly misled we have been. Bill Clinton was impeached for lying about a blow job. Lying your way to war seems infinitely more grounds for removal.
Monday, March 19, 2007
[+/-] |
New Rules for Cliches |
I'm glued to Bill Maher's HBO show from start to finish, but if pressed for a favorite segment it would be "New Rules." In that spirit, I present these suggested New Rules for cliches.
In a Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel column titled "Thompson won't spend millions on mediocrity," Mike Vandermause writes "While some teams have been throwing money around like drunken sailors, Thompson has taken a more conservative approach."
I have no quarrel with the Packers' GM here. It's with the columnist and his "drunken sailor" reference. Isn't this disrespectful to troops who haven't had a drop of alcohol since being assigned their hopeless mission in Iraq -- which is neither Afghanistan or Saudi Arabia, for those who care?
NEW RULE: Metaphors for frivolous spending must now refer to Pacman Jones instead of members of the military. Never heard of Pacman? Among the 10 incidents where the Tennessee Titans' cornerback has been interviewed by police is his presence during a Las Vegas strip club/NBA All-Star weekend triple-shooting that left one man paralyzed.
The trouble started after 4 a.m., when Jones and his entourage of a half-dozen people -- including the alleged shooter -- returned to the club for the second time that evening.
Jones tossed hundreds of $1 bills on the stripper stage. When a dancer started grabbing the money without Jones' permission, he got angry, grabbed her hair and slammed her head against the stage.
How many drunken sailors have you seen behave like that?
Next up is the latest cliche, "it is what it is." No, it isn't. It was what it was, perhaps, but you can't refer to something that happened in the past as if it were happening now.
NEW RULE: "It is what it is" becomes "It was what it was." Either that, or we go back to talking about giving 110 percent and putting pants on one leg at a time.
Suddenly it occurs to me that I'm out of suggestions and that you might have ideas of your own. So I end this encouraging you faithful readers to submit your NEW RULE for cliches.
Sunday, March 18, 2007
[+/-] |
Best Spring Break Forecast Ever! |
Showers
46°/38°
Wednesday, March 21
Showers
48°/44°
Thursday, March 22
Showers
51°/48°
Friday, March 23
Showers
52°/44°
Saturday, March 24
Few Showers (woo!)
52°/42°
Saturday, March 17, 2007
[+/-] |
No better sound |
A serious amount of giggling is going on around my kitchen table this Saturday night, but, for once, I'm only listening. Instead, my daughter and Best Friend are drinking an ill-advised amount of Pepsi as they try to determine how long they've known each other and what their first and best and most recent "misadventures" have been. Nothing like a nostalgic fourth grader.
Yes, I am eavesdropping a bit, but not to find out that they met when when one made blue Gatorade come out of the other's nose. Most of what they're saying is incomprehensibly silly, but I love to hear this particular friendship both take root and bloom. The vagaries of elementary school being what they are, who knows how long this duo lasts, but the odds seem good that they'll be together for me to remind them of this night long after they've forgotten the flood of cola that eventually coated the linoleum.
While they won't have Neopets or a menagerie of little plastic bobbleheaded animals in common for much longer, their shared sensibility and sense of humor could last, and will, if the number of spur-of-the-moment sleepovers I approve has anything to do with it. I can't choose my daughter's friends, but I can certainly play favorites, at least now, when they're young, and the mothering is easy.* Life is hard and kids are mean; doing my part to help my child have friends she can rely on seems the least I can do, even if it means an eternally sticky floor.
*relatively
Thursday, March 15, 2007
[+/-] |
If I could put pretentiousness in a bottle. . . |
from a Seattle restaurant menu:
BOTTLES
BUDWEISER, St. Louis, Missouri 4.
COORS LIGHT, Colorado Springs, Colorado 4.
HEINEKEN LIGHT, Amsterdam, Holland 5.
CORONA, Mexico 4.
HEINEKEN, Amsterdam, Holland 5.
I think I'll be sure to have dinner there next week so I can ask them to check the Born On dates, too.
[+/-] |
I guess they showed me |
Or, the post in which Allison is forced to admit Missouri did something right. Living in the lllinois half of this bi-state area, one grows to expect a certain amount of misguided condescension from Missourians, a group of people who tend to believe that the world ends at the western edge of the Mississippi, or at least right past the strip clubs clustered near the east end of the river bridges. “Why would anyone live in Illinois?” they wonder. Well, for starters, it’s not Missouri, the state with an educational system that rivals that of Arkansas and a population happy to have sent John Ashcroft both to their governor’s mansion and the U.S. Senate.
Thankfully, my interaction with Missouri's government is usually limited to filing my Non-Resident tax return, a document that, even more than most government forms, is Brazil-like bureaucracy put to paper. While I suppose I should just be happy that I'll never have to again file paper returns in three states against $12.47 of income divided among nine W-2s (true story) (except for the $12.47 part) (but it might as well have been), the Missouri 1040 irritates me so much that for years I have gladly paid the extra twenty bucks for a second Tax Cut state program just to not have to deal with it--even though I, as a non-resident, still had to print a ream of paper forms to send with paper copies of everything else across the border to Jefferson City so I could wait for my paper refund check. Such burdens I bear. Until this weekend, when I finally summoned the energy to find an envelope and a stamp only to find out, nearly accidentally, that I could finally file Missouri's return online. The Show Me state gets with the century! Strange but true.
Stranger still, though, was the fact that two days after I filed, my refund was in my checking account. Two days? That's so efficient as to be distrubing, but at least Missouri won't have what's rightfully mine to help fund the kind of mean-spirited, short-sighted immigration legislation that makes me glad I don't live there. That bill's another post or three, but in the meantime I guess I'll take my refund money and buy a few week's worth of gas to get to my job, in part funded by Missouri tax dollars, helping educate the very Missouri students that proposed Missouri law would thwart. Ah, Missouri government. What is it you're showing me?
Tuesday, March 13, 2007
[+/-] |
A winning Pack gathers no Moss |
Up to this point, I've dismissed rumors of the Packers' interest in acquiring wide receiver Randy Moss as baseless speculation. But apparently, as is usually the case, there's something to the rumors.
As reported in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, General Manager Ted Thompson was to make a pitch to the Packers' brass today about his keen interest in acquiring the troubled -- and troubling -- wideout.
Sources have said the two teams have been discussing Moss for more than a month. On Monday, a source familiar with the inner workings of both organizations said Thompson had spoken directly with Raiders owner Al Davis about dealing for Moss.
Apparently, Packers negotiator Andrew Brandt has already had preliminary talks to restructure Moss' remaining base salaries of $9.75 million in 2007 and $11.25 million in '08.
Yes, the clock is ticking on Brett Favre's Hall of Fame career and a solid deep threat would greatly improve his chances of going out on top. But Moss? Not Santana, mind you, Randy.
The same guy who infamously pretended to moon Packer fans in Lambeau Field when he was the poster boy for that model organization, the Minnesota Vikings. The same guy who pouts, seems to have lost a step or three and takes more plays off than on for the Raiders, another model organization.
Favre isn't a vocal leader, but he has shown he doesn't take kindly to fools (see Javon Walker). And even if Moss were to play nice for a year for a quarterback he reportedly respects, what happens when Favre retires?
One of the things I've always respected the most about the Packers is how they carry themselves as an organization, on and off the field. With chairman of the board Bob Harlan, the chief architect of that stellar public image, set to retire in May, years of hard work could come tumbling down with one ill-advised trade.
I beg you, Ted Thompson, don't do it.
Monday, March 12, 2007
[+/-] |
Cause and Effect |
So first I read this:
Cheney Assails Those Favoring Iraq Drawdown, in which the devil himself again accuses the Democrats in Congress of treason.
And then I read this:
Dems Abandon War Authority Provision, in which said Democrats again prove themselves to be, to put it far more politely than they deserve, freaking useless.
And then, just for the hell of it, I took my blood pressure: 166/88. Again demonstrating that the top number is the one that responds to fury.
Surely, given the sheer quantity of rot that's cascading through this most malevolent mis-administration, from the White House to the military to Justice to every agency in its poisoned line, the entire evil enterprise will come crashing down under its own contemptible weight. For all of our sakes, I hope that implosion comes soon. For me, I just hope it comes before the stroke.
[+/-] |
(Not) Bright and early |
While reverting to a pre-dawn commute sucked just as much as I knew it would, in the interest of mental health and lower blood pressure allow me to try to rise above my genes (if we can't find something negative to say--eh, we can always find something negative to say) and accentuate the positive in this morning's pitch black drive:
1. Turning up a new-to-me CD loud enough to keep me (and my fellow commuters) awake.
2. Not being slowed down on the bridge by drivers who cannot tell the difference between the reflection of the sun and actual brake lights.
3. Are you kidding me?
[+/-] |
God save little league baseball |
I've been party to innumerable dysfunctional organizations in my lifetime -- even shared one with my fellow blogger here -- but I'm not sure anything compares to this well-intentioned, but hopelessly inept little league baseball program I've latched onto.
I don't even know where to begin, so I'll start with the latest fiasco.
We're hosting a tournament next month and as of this writing 36 teams have signed up. It wasn't my bad idea, but I stepped up as tournament director and have dedicated myself to making it a success.
With soccer and wrestling tournaments in town that same weekend, hotel rooms are scarce. Our vice president, who also happens to coach my son's team, made arrangements to block off 10 rooms at a hotel on the outskirts of town.
So I was troubled Friday morning when the coach of one of the visiting teams that I had steered toward this hotel informed me that our rooms had been canceled. In response to my urgent inquiry, coach tells me he canceled the reservations because we would have had to pay for any rooms that weren't rented.
Are you kidding me?!!!! I shouldn't have been surprised though. This is the same coach who last year repeatedly signaled slow runners on second base to steal third with two outs, the game on the line, and good hitters at the plate.
And he's not even the least competent member of our board. That would be the treasurer, a man so elected because of his success as a well-digging businessman. The very definition of luddite, he doesn't do e-mail. When I questioned him about my inability to fax him information about the organization, he explained the his wife was on the computer and I should fax before 8 a.m. or after 6 p.m.
Just yesterday he explained to me in excruciating detail his plans for improving the high school field. Soon after, my eyes glazed over, he handed me our organization's checkbook. Keep in mind, he's the treasurer and I'm the secretary.
He won't be available for next weekend's scheduling meeting, he explained, because he's escorting his ADD grandson with a rocket arm but shit for brains to Phoenix for a baseball camp. He invited my son along, you know, depending on what he wanted to do with the sport.
Fortunately, I didn't need the $700 entry fee as an excuse. My son will be in school, where he belongs. Sure I'd love to see him sign a major league baseball contract someday, but I'm not putting all of my eggs in that basket.
In order to stand the test of time, this organization will need brighter minds than those who currently rule the roost.
Sunday, March 11, 2007
[+/-] |
Curses! (on Sunday, even) |
Tick, tick, tick, tick, tick.
When I was a kid, I rarely heard the 60 Minutes second hand tick by, but when I did, it was a thrill. Did I have some inappropriate interest in Morley Safer or Mike Wallace? Was Andy Rooney's whine music to my ears? Most definitely not. But if we were still at my grandma's house after 6 o'clock, we weren't going back for the second church service of the day, and that was more than fine with me.
Times change, though, and lately that infernal ticking has been the last thing I wanted to hear on a Sunday, as it was only be a sign that the CBS schedule--and my DVR timer--was screwed up again, and it still wasn't time for The Amazing Race theme music to kick in. That's one annoyance I don't need, Sunday evening being just another name for Monday morning to me.
By Sunday evening, I need to be working, making plans and creating materials, or at least deciding how I'll finesse my semi-preparedness. I've been happy to shove responsibility aside, though, at least for an hour, to make sure that I get to watch Rob and Amber race. Judge me if you will, but having my favorite contestants on my favorite show is definitely Must See TV for me.
If you don't know who Rob and Amber are, you clearly need to watch more television, as they have been doing a fine job of stretching out their 15 minutes. If you know who Rob is and wish you didn't, then I don't think we can ever be friends.
I'd describe the appeal of the inexplicably infamous Boston Rob in more detail, but it's all a moot point now. He and Amber were Philiminated tonight, leaving this edition of The Amazing Race without any actual All Stars and my Sunday evening schedule with a gaping hole. If Rob and Amber are off somewhere memorizing the spelling of Philippines instead of flummoxing other racers and entertaining me, I've no choice but to find another method of procrastination. Like, say, writing a post.
Friday, March 09, 2007
[+/-] |
Out on a school night |
If only the guest of honor hadn't been felled by Jack in the Box--go figure--our rare Thursday evening foray into the grown-up world have been a birthday celebration, but, the birthday boy was in fact indisposed. What else for the rest of us to do, then, than to go out for no reason on a school night. Life is short. Weekends are few. And the world's twenty-year-olds shouldn't be the only ones having weeknight fun.
On the other hand, no twenty-year-old would have made it into this particular bar, Harrah's security being more tediously thorough than TSA agents screening my old friend Muhammed at the airport. It's not as if a quick glance in our general direction wouldn't prove we're--thank goodness--not under twenty-one, but we lost the first fifteen minutes of the opening act to the ticket purchase/id check/"reward card" issue/ticket scan/card scan/hand stamp gauntlet. I want those fifteen minutes back, too, because damn, that boy can sing (not that you can prove it with a youtube video).
Will Hoge
Woman Be Strong
[+/-] |
Hot Office |
Nelly meets The Office.
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
[+/-] |
Surprise Package |
Though online shopping has made visits from the UPS man (sorry, I don't know that I've ever even see a UPS woman) much more mundane than they ever were, I still do love to find a brown box on the porch. Even if it's just another pair of shoes, identical to the ones she wears, that my daughter will reject as "feeling funny," as least there's the pretend-it's-a-gift-and-not-a-line-on-the-Mastercard-statement fun of opening a package. So I can't tell you how grateful I am not to have this simple pleasure ruined forever as I suspect it was for these Michiganders:
Human Head, Liver Dropped at Mich. Home
GRAND RAPIDS, Mich. (AP) -- A human liver and part of a head were accidentally delivered to a couple's home instead of the northern Michigan lab that was expecting them, delivery service DHL said.
The preserved parts, sent from China and meant for medical research, were mistakenly dropped off March 1 at Franc and Ludivine Larmande's home near Grand Rapids.
The bubble-wrapped items were part of a larger shipment that became separated and were left by a DHL driver who believed they were pieces to a table also delivered to the Larmandes. The body parts, which had been treated by a procedure that hardens and protects them, were intended for Traverse City-based Corcoran Laboratories Inc., DHL said.
The recovered specimens were shipped to the lab, and all the missing parts have been accounted for, the company said Tuesday.
(Posted with apologies to Christina, whom I suspect has already deleted her comment about me writing anything worthwhile.)
[+/-] |
Tavin on NASCAR |
Who didn't see this coming?
Tuesday, March 06, 2007
[+/-] |
160/100 |
My insurance company, being oh so interested in keeping its policyholders healthy as long as it doesn't cost them anything, displays a list of tips for keeping one's blood pressure low on the front page of its website. Having begun to test the limits of my coverage in part to determine if my terrible cardiac genes have finally kicked in, I actually read their suggestions and discovered a serious omission. Namely, to keep one's blood pressure low, DO NOT READ YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY'S WEBSITE. And yes, I am shouting. Isn't venting a heart-healthy choice?
Discovering that the physician-finder feature is now entirely non-functional was annoying enough. No matter how I phrase my search, it refuses to admit there's a participating provider within 100 miles of me. Given that I have participated with providers up the wazoo (and, ladies, we all know how uncomfortable that can be) in recent weeks, I beg to differ, but it would be nice to be able to get some advance information from this supposedly informational site.
On second thought, maybe it wouldn't, as the information the site does provide does little but infuriate me.
I know I'm lucky to have insurance, having occasionally gone without or made do with policies that would only kick in if I were to kick in if I were hit by the proverbial bus. But I also know my access to subsidized medical care is more tenuous than it may seem. If I had to cover my family on my school district's policy, for example, I'd have to do without or quit my job--that premium would steal 40 percent of my take-home pay.
So, for now, I'm on the right side of the equation, where the constants are twenty dollar co-pays and the variables are few. It's how this equation is balanced, though, that sends my blood pressure soaring. Case in point, I had some blood work done for which the lab charged $476.39. Total benefit paid? $31.81! For those discount shoppers out there, that's a 94 percent discount. Ninety-four percent! The claim is closed, the lab is satisfied, and I'm not responsible for the remaining $444.58. Who is? The poor schmuck who needs the same care I did but doesn't have an insurance company to foot the bill or whittle it down to nothing. Of course, that's not entirely true, as someone without coverage is more likely to go without than pony up a non-urgent $500, but the fact remains that those who can least afford it are expected to face the bill-collector or the consequences.
It's wrong, it's unsustainable, and if I think about it too much more, I'll be filing another claim by morning.
[+/-] |
Rebels without a cause |
If nearly a week goes by without an original post, is a blog still relevant? Not if it never was, I suppose. It's not like readers were clamoring for more from this blog. In fact, no one even noticed when I posted -- and immediately retracted -- suggestions that I wished the vice president dead. I don't, of course. I have a much crueler fate in mind.
But this blog is telling, I think, as much in what's not said as what is. The aforementioned Dick Cheney flap, Ann Coulter's latest outrageous remarks, steamy photos of an American Idol contestant and Ahman Green's departure from the Green Bay Packers all happened this week and nary a mention was made here.
It's not that these issues -- and many more -- didn't spark our creative juices. It's just that politics, news and sports (#s 2-4 on our most frequent category topics) sometimes take a back seat to life (#1), parenting (#10), work (#16) and weather (#17).
As Al Gore was collecting an Oscar for his documentary on global warming, I was battling the worst case of spring fever I can remember. As a wacko Florida judge (pardon the redundancy) was determining Anna Nicole Smith's final resting place, I was editing obituaries for folks with far less fame, but no less a right to a dignified death. As Britney Spears was alternately checking in and out of rehab centers, tattoo parlors and beauty (?) shops, I was balancing the job for which I'm paid vs. the duties for which I've volunteered vs. the family that both makes it all possible and drives me to accomplish more.
So pardon me for not going to the trouble of inserting Technorati tags that don't work anyway. I'm done posting columns by Maureen Dowd and items about hermaphrodite deer in a desperate ploy to attract readers. I may still post those things, and Tavin videos too, but my motives have changed.
As grateful as I am for this forum, I see no need to pander to the audience. There's far too much of that as it is. I have things to say and I'll say them here. Whether anyone cares to read them is not my concern.
Monday, March 05, 2007
[+/-] |
Not only boys and their toys |
"Mom," calls my daughter, climbing up the stairs with a purpose. "Something's wrong with the computer. It keeps locking or up going black or I don't know."
"So, uh, can I use the laptop?"
Busted.
Nothing's wrong with that 2 year old Dell with the pretty pretty LCD monitor except that it's not the newest toy in the house, this even prettier notebook brought home only weeks ago. That much I know without even asking a question, but thirty seconds of discussion confirms my supposition and inadvertently triggers the tears. I suppose there are advantages to having a child who punishes herself more harshly than I'm inclined, but sometimes I'd prefer not to have to comfort the offender. I'm glad she recognizes she's made a mistake, but it doesn't seem worth crying herself to sleep over.
On the other hand, what mother would want to dissuade her daughter from crying when she's been caught in a lie, no matter how matter how insignificant or understandable--it's not as if I don't hear the siren song of wireless internet myself. But as I point out why it's a bad choice to tell the in-house tech support person (me!) a computer is broken when it isn't, I'm not entirely sure if she's hearing the value of honesty or tips for constructing a better tale. A little of both, I imagine, but I suppose time (and middle school) will tell . In the meantime, I take comfort in her soft heart and try to laugh with her father as I tell him the story. Of all the things for her to covet; she surely is our child.
Dear girl. I know why you want to use this computer; it's why I'm using it myself. So next time, just tell me straight. Otherwise, the ultimate punishment awaits: dial-up!
Sunday, March 04, 2007
[+/-] |
That Was The Week That Wasn't |
You know something's not right if days go by in which Dick Cheney is nearly blown up, Al Sharpton's ancestors were found to be owned by Strom Thurmond's ancestors, and Cardinal baseball tickets went on sale and yet there's nothing new to be found on this page but virtual tumbleweeds and another lame comment by my least favorite anonymous Iowan. But considering it took us four months and a week that included a referral to a neurologist for our open thread to hit such a dry spell, I'm not going to sweat it. Those are, after all, the doctor's orders.
Monday, February 26, 2007
[+/-] |
I can read his lips, and he is not praying. |
An excellent profile of our open thread icon Keith Olbermann, because why not.
[+/-] |
A candlelit Saturday night |
"Electric" would absolutely be the wrong verb to describe my Saturday night, although there was something magical about weather-induced family time. While the "perfect storm," as the weather hallucinators dubbed it, didn't pack quite the punch they forecast, ice and wind were sufficient to knock out power throughout town and much of Iowa.
I'm not normally one to run to the grocery store whenever I'm told the sky is falling, but I did load up on certain necessities this time. While others were stocking up on milk and bread, I shopped for vodka, chips and DVDs.
We were halfway through "Barnyard" before I discovered the error of my ways. It takes electricity to run just about every household appliance -- including, ironically enough, gas powered ones. When the power went out for good around 6:30 p.m., I nearly had a panic attack.
It wasn't cold enough for worry, thankfully, but I soon realized how dependent I've become on television and the Internets. Even radio wasn't an option when I discovered my self-charging radio only worked as long as I was willing to crank the handle to charge it.
I called several hotels in a futile effort to find one with both electricity and vacancy as my wife lit more candles than I could count. If the hotels were without power, I reasoned unreasonably, the bars probably were too. So much for my anticipation of Rainn Wilson hosting "Saturday Night Live."
I had nowhere to run to, baby, no place to hide. So I settled in for an unplanned family night. The family wouldn't play Scrabble with me, so we agreed on Triple Yahtzee. My son won, even after I corrected his math, but I'm not competitive.
Then we moved to the living room and, for once, lived. We talked and talked. My kids, long since tired of my usual stories, demanded new ones. We all shared memories that evoked other memories. It was fun. It was like camping, without the bugs.
I was grateful to see the power restored about 1 a.m., though thankful to Mother Nature for giving us a family night to remember.
Sunday, February 25, 2007
[+/-] |
Looking out for Mom |
One Saturday morning, when I was almost exactly the age my own daughter is now, I spent what seemed like hours peeking from behind a corner of my window shade as uniformed men and women, some purposeful, some not, walked in and out of our front door. Listening to the crackle of their radios, I strained for a hint of what was happening as I counted the fire trucks and police cars that lined our dead-end street. More than one person had called in our medical emergency, and it appeared that the entire county had responded, if only for the lack of anything better to do. If I had been looking, I'm sure I would have seen our neighbors pushing back their curtains or boldly staring from their yards, but I wasn't looking. I was waiting. My younger brother was out there, in the middle of it all, but, scared of what I might find, or hear, or see, I didn't want to get too close. Later, when they wheeled my mother out to the ambulance, I, still at my surveillance post, was reassured to notice that she had insisted the paramedics allow her to get dressed. She's not a vain woman, and I knew refusing to go to the hospital in a faded gown and housecoat was as good of a sign as any stable vitals they may have recorded. Nobody reads a mother better than her child, even from the other side of the window.
I don't remember if my mother was checked directly in to the hospital that day, or how long she was gone once she was admitted, but other memories of that time are as vivid as the paramedics' visit. The days my father's mother and sister used my mother's absence to swoop in and rearrange all our furniture and toss out anything they didn't personally see a use for are forever in my memory, filed under Tragedies I Failed to Prevent. My brother and I may have been young, but we recognized a crime when we saw one. All we could think to do, once it became clear we couldn't stop that offense, was crawl out my bedroom window. It would have been more satisfying had my grandmother ever realized we were gone, but at least we could tell our mother that we knew better than to aid and abet.
Soon enough, my mother recovered from her surgery if not her unwanted home makeover and resumed holding down our rearranged fort as she always had done. Those days, though, stand out on the timeline of my childhood, both for what happened and for marking our first realizations of what might happen someday. Before that, the notion that my mother could be vulnerable never entered my mind.
Yesterday, it was deja vu all over again, only I was the one riding away in the ambulance and my daughter was the one hiding out. This Saturday was a pale imitation of the original, as sequels so often are, but for once I'm relieved to not measure up. Only one police car and one ambulance arrived at our home, and if the neighbors noticed, they haven't let on. My episode proved to be insignificant, and I was home before the afternoon was over, allowing my mother enough time to take out my trash but not re-organize my kitchen. My daughter played her own version of my part, "crying [her] eyes out", she later reported, but answering what I hoped was a reassuring call down the stairs with a strong voice. How she reconciled my "I'm okay" with my walk to the ambulance, I'm not sure, but perhaps she noticed my outfit. If her mother was up and dressed that early on a weekend morning, surely nothing could really be wrong.
Friday, February 23, 2007
[+/-] |
Someone's worst nightmare |
Dead in a ditch on the side of the road.
That's the fate my father's overactive imagination always conjured for us when he realized we were even a few minutes late or not exactly where we said we'd be. He's a worrier by nature and by genetics--his mother was the queen of unfounded, exaggerated dread—someone who cannot help but see disaster around every corner. Given that he was equally concerned whether we were crossing the street or crossing the country, his penchant for worst-case-scenarios just became part of the background noise of our lives.
It's okay, Dad; we'll be fine.
And, by chance or by fate or by the power of his prayers, we have been fine. Only once have I ended up in a ditch, along with, my pride compels me to point out, every other car that was headed South to Chicago on that snow-covered stretch of I-43. We were unhurt, and, to our extreme relief, we had enough cash to get the miraculously unscathed rental car towed back onto the road. Nonetheless, if my father ever heard the story of that trip to Midway, I’m sure the ditches were carefully edited out. Better to insist his fears were irrational that to provide proof that they were not.
Even now that censoring habit is so ingrained that I hesitated a little before forwarding my mother the news story that recounted what I saw on the way into work this morning: a dead body in a ditch on the side of the road. There’s no drama to my early morning tale, only the slowly dawning realization of why lights were flashing, and cops were tramping through the median grass, and dark shoes were peeking out from under a plastic tarp. A 22 year old man, according to the paper, somehow dead. In a ditch. By the side of the road.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
[+/-] |
Parent without a clue |
Most of the time, parenting seems to be the ultimate high-risk, low-reward vocation. I try to do the best I can, hoping to be a better dad to my kids than mine was to me. That's not a very high bar, yet success is no guarantee.
I've been at it going on 14 years now and still have lots to learn. High school promises new challenges and opportunities, more failures and disappointments. I have the best kids in the world, don't get me wrong, but I often think I'm just plain lucky.
And then there are moments, usually when you least expect it, when you know you've done something right -- even if you can't quite figure out what that is.
Tonight brought one of those moments. Nodding off on the couch while watching the news and skipping my son's orchestra performance -- which automatically disqualifies me from "good dad" consideration -- my precocious 10-year-old daughter walks into the room, shuts off the TV and sits down beside me.
"I have something I need to talk to you about," she says with the seriousness of someone three times her age.
I sit up and brace myself for what's to follow, though I haven't a clue. It's immediately clear she's given this a lot of thought.
"You know how I like animals?" she begins.
I listen, respond appropriately so she knows I'm hearing, and don't fly off the handle when she says she no longer wants to eat meat. All my work to make her an expensive date -- developing her taste for shrimp, crab and lobster -- is out the window.
Perhaps someone at school has planted these thoughts in her head, though she assures me that's not the case. I suspect a neighbor, but don't say so for fear of damaging an important family relationship. I silently question if "Wife Swap" is appropriate family entertainment. Monday's episode, after all, featured a self-sufficient Iowa farm family which subsided on raw meat.
I'm a dedicated meat-and-potatoes guy who prefers my steak medium well. I nearly had a cow, and haven't been back since, when I first experienced Red Robin and was presented the options of "pink or no pink" -- as if that's all there is. Sushi has never crossed these lips.
A vegetarian diet is a foreign concept in this household. But I'm willing to entertain it if only out of flattery for the manner in which she chose to broach the subject.
In the grand scheme of things, meat or no meat is inconsequential. Peanut butter is loaded with protein, I reason. But there's no substitute for the moment daddy's girl confided in her dad. I cherish it, and hope there's more to come.
Then we settle in for more questionably appropriate family entertainment -- "My Name is Earl" and "The Office." It's not in any parenting manual, but it seems to work for us.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
[+/-] |
Hillary is not David Geffen’s dreamgirl |
by Maureen Dowd
“Whoever is the nominee is going to win, so the stakes are very high,” says Mr. Geffen, the Hollywood mogul and sultan of “Dreamgirls,” as he sits by a crackling fire beneath a Jasper Johns flag and a matched pair of de Koonings in the house that Jack Warner built (which old-time Hollywood stars joked was the house that God would have built). “Not since the Vietnam War has there been this level of disappointment in the behavior of America throughout the world, and I don’t think that another incredibly polarizing figure, no matter how smart she is and no matter how ambitious she is — and God knows, is there anybody more ambitious than Hillary Clinton? — can bring the country together.
“Obama is inspirational, and he’s not from the Bush royal family or the Clinton royal family. Americans are dying every day in Iraq. And I’m tired of hearing James Carville on television.”
Barack Obama has made an entrance in Hollywood unmatched since Scarlett O’Hara swept into the Twelve Oaks barbecue. Instead of the Tarleton twins, the Illinois senator is flirting with the Dreamworks trio: Mr. Geffen, Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, who gave him a party last night that raised $1.3 million and Hillary’s hackles.
She didn’t stand outside the gates to the Geffen mansion, where glitterati wolfed down Wolfgang Puck savories, singing the Jennifer Hudson protest anthem “And I Am Telling You I’m Not Going.” But she’s not exactly Little Miss Sunshine, either. Hillary loyalists have hissed at defecting donors to remember the good old days of jumping on the Lincoln Bedroom bed.
“Hillary is livid that Obama’s getting the first big fund-raiser here,” one friend of hers said.
Who can pay attention to the Oscar battle between “The Queen” and “Dreamgirls” when you’ve got a political battle between a Queen and a Dreamboy?
Terry McAuliffe and First Groupie Bill have tried to hoard the best A.T.M. machine in politics for the Missus, but there’s some Clinton fatigue among fatigued Clinton donors, who fret that Bill will “pull the focus” and shelve his wife’s campaign.
“I don’t think anybody believes that in the last six years, all of a sudden Bill Clinton has become a different person,” Mr. Geffen says, adding that if Republicans are digging up dirt, they’ll wait until Hillary’s the nominee to use it. “I think they believe she’s the easiest to defeat.”
She is overproduced and overscripted. “It’s not a very big thing to say, ‘I made a mistake’ on the war, and typical of Hillary Clinton that she can’t,” Mr. Geffen says. “She’s so advised by so many smart advisers who are covering every base. I think that America was better served when the candidates were chosen in smoke-filled rooms.”
The babble here is not about “Babel”; it’s about the battle of the billionaires. Not only have Ron Burkle and David Geffen been vying to buy The Los Angeles Times — they have been vying to raise money for competing candidates. Mr. Burkle, a supermarket magnate, is close to the Clintons, and is helping Hillary parry Barry Obama by arranging a fund-raiser for her in March, with a contribution from Mr. Spielberg.
Did Mr. Spielberg get in trouble with the Clintons for helping Senator Obama? “Yes,” Mr. Geffen replies, slyly. Can Obambi stand up to Clinton Inc.? “I hope so,” he says, “because that machine is going to be very unpleasant and unattractive and effective.”
Once, David Geffen and Bill Clinton were tight as ticks. Mr. Geffen helped raise some $18 million for Bill and slept in the Lincoln Bedroom twice. Bill chilled at Chateau Geffen. Now, the Dreamworks co-chairman calls the former president “a reckless guy” who “gave his enemies a lot of ammunition to hurt him and to distract the country.”
They fell out in 2000, when Mr. Clinton gave a pardon to Marc Rich after rebuffing Mr. Geffen’s request for one for Leonard Peltier. “Marc Rich getting pardoned? An oil-profiteer expatriate who left the country rather than pay taxes or face justice?” Mr. Geffen says. “Yet another time when the Clintons were unwilling to stand for the things that they genuinely believe in. Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it’s troubling.”
The mogul knows it’s easy to mock Hollywood — “people with Priuses and private planes” — and agrees with George Clooney that it’s probably not helpful for stars to campaign for candidates, given the caricatures of Hollywood.
I ask what he will say if he ever runs into Bill Clinton again. “ ‘Hi,’ ” he replies. And will he be upset if Hillary wins and he never gets to sleep in the Lincoln Bedroom again?
“No,” he says with a puckish smile. “It’s not as nice as my bedroom.”
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
[+/-] |
Sunrise, sunset |
The temperature did its mid-winter in mid-America thing today, climbing high enough to send this weekend's snow and yet another measure of topsoil flowing down the street and into the lake. It's a muddy mess, but it's not tundra, and that's a grand improvement. Come July, our complaints will be as bitter as a real winter wind if the mercury dips anywhere near fifty, but today, even at dusk, it feels warm enough to slide open the kitchen door and enjoy a preview of Spring. The lingering daylight and the relative warmth are enough to make me shrug at the safflower seed that's scattered all over the deck now that my daughter's icy bird feeders have melted. Lulled by the sun, I idly wonder if the cardinals and jays have moved on to more generous digs, but I don't gripe about the mess. A cold nugget of dread hardens in my chest, though, when I consider what this break from winter means, when I consider what's coming next. What's coming, thanks to the United States Congress, weeks earlier than it should.
Years into this unnatural routine, I'm more or less numb to the horror of getting out of bed before five a.m, but I'll never grow accustomed to traveling the pitch-black highways with long-haul truckers and state troopers only to end up, a little disoriented, a little sleepy, and perhaps a little miraculously safe, at work instead of at some cross-country destination. This time of year, when the sun has actually risen by the time I open the garage door, it's a much more tolerable drive, and probably less dangerous, too. As soon as we spring--or are dragged unwillingly--forward, I'll be plunged back into the darkness. Perhaps, then, it's understandable that so I'm less than thrilled that Daylight Saving Time is now mandated to start on March 11, weeks earlier than ever. Yes, the evening light is lovely, but it will be May before it seems like a fair trade, and in the meantime, it's oh, so, dark when my day begins. They've now caved to interstate pressure, but is it possible that Indiana once had something right, and that time should just be left to march on alone?
How totally typical that the only supposed energy conservation measure our representatives have managed to pass is this meaningless shift of the clocks. I'm not one to illuminate every light in the house, but I surely don't get dressed in the dark, and I don't own appliances that draw less juice depending on the position of the sun. Yet, for what thus seems like no reason at all, I get to lose an hour of sleep and make that surreal psuedo-midnight drive for three extra weeks of the year. Call me a cranky constituent. If we could harness the hubris it takes to act as if the U. S. Congress can slow the actual rotation of the earth--and if you notice how many times the phrase "add an hour of daylight" appears in the action's justifications, it's as if someone believes that's true--there'd be no energy crisis at all, and, better yet, no driving to work each morning in the dark of night.
Monday, February 19, 2007
[+/-] |
Presidents Day Copy & Paste |
Because, after all, the President of the United States was not always an irresponsible, inarticulate danger to us all:
"With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”
From Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address
March 4, 1865
Saturday, February 17, 2007
[+/-] |
This week's sign of the apocolypse: Britney goes bald |
I don't know why I (or anyone) cares, but WTF?! It would seem Britney's life had taken a turn for the better when she dumped that loser Kevin Federline. And when I think of shaved body parts she's willing to flash in public, her head never crossed my mind. Perhaps she's distraught over Anna Nicole Smith's passing (or, more likely, the publicity that has generated) or has the aforementioned FedEx stepped forward as the father of her baby? It boggles the mind to think what goes through the heads of people without them. We all know that sex sells. Bald women are not sexy. Bald women in tattoo parlors are downright scary. There are no bald women in tattoo parlors in the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition. Man law?
[+/-] |
What, no hermaphrodite deer? |
Here at the Southern outpost of our open thread it has been a slow moving Saturday. Other than a nap, a newspaper, some cold pizza, and a procrastinated science fair project, I'm already drawing a blank on what became of my day. I don't much mind the squandered time, given that it's a three day weekend, but I do wonder what I missed. Checking the hard news bonanza that is CNN.com, I find today is Biological Freakshow Day: the top stories of the day are Bush's moles (the dermatological, not informational, kind), Anna Nicole's embalming, Britney's shaved head, and an honest-to-goodness four-legged duck. I swear, if the last, decadent days of the Roman Empire had had a website it would have had to have been the Latin version of that.
Playing a hunch, I fire up one of my favorite toys, the Internet Archive Wayback Machine, and check out past versions of the CNN homepage. I'm a little disappointed that the oldest page is only from 2000, but I click it anyway and find links for tropical storm Beryl and the Democratic National Convention. The what-might-have-beens from that pre-stolen-election time are enough to turn my stomach, but at least there are no mutants--animals or celebrities-- to make me queasy. The next news I rediscover, from my birthday in 2001, was especially virtuous, with a call for world peace from the pope and heart surgery for a South Pole doc. That was pre-9/11, though, and I'm sure the headlines from the last quarter of the year would be different. Finally, looking to appease my sense of symmetry (read: compulsive nature) I scan the database for February 17s and find only one. The stories from 2/17/2004 are a slightly different style of sensational-- the Peterson case and a South African "thrown to the lions"--but perhaps they posed as real news more easily than Britney and Anna Nicole ever could.
It's a meaningless sample, I know, but I bet it suggests a little bit of truth: that the worse reality seems to be, the more we seek to avoid it.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
[+/-] |
Another kind of Valentine |
"Oh, you girls. . ."
What does it mean when, at our age, my friend's mother admonishes our giggles the same way she would have--did--when we were barely out of our teens? I'm not sure what it says about my emotional maturity, but I love what it says about the friendship I value most.
I never was able to keep a straight face, and somewhere along the way, I stopped trying. Life's too short--and too strange, too difficult, too messy, and too good, too-- not to laugh at what strikes me funny, even if no one else gets the joke, even if the cool kids are giving me that sideways glance that says, "what's her problem?"
Trust me, uptight, appearance-obsessed, cool kids of the grown-up world, there is no problem. In my life, there is always, always someone else who gets the joke-- or who will, if nothing else, laugh at my inevitably botched re-telling of it. And though that does describe everyone who's close to me--if we don't laugh together, we're surely not even casual friends--there's one person with whom I've collapsed in helpless laughter more than any other, and this post is for her.
Is there more to our friendship than a shared sense of humor? Well, duh, as we're still likely to say. Of course there is. But each time I try to catch my breath and regain my composure so I can finish my meal or my conversation, and each time I must studiously avoid eye contact with her so I don't lose it entirely in a quiet crowd, I notice that too many people in the world are not having nearly as much fun, and I know that I'm lucky to have something that not everyone does.
If I claimed that the key to this endless stream of laughter was the intimacy of thousands of shared experiences and nearly twenty years of in-jokes , my premise wouldn't be questioned, but it wouldn't be entirely true. Sure, we've had a laugh for all occasions for a long time now, but we've been giggling like easily amused schoolgirls since we actually were school-or at least college--girls who didn't know each other that well at all. We laughed so much through the writing of the otherwise hateful group research paper that fate assigned us that I was determined to stay her friend long after the final draft was typed. One of the defining relationships of my life, and I owe it all to inappropriate giddiness in the computer lab. Life is, indeed, unpredictable.
To be all Valentine's Day about it, I'm not sure there really is any explaining the hetero girlfriend equivalent of love at first sight. I do know, however, that we sure have always laughed more than most people do, and we surely always will. For that certainty, and that laughter, and for that singular, enduring, more-than-a-friendship, I will always be grateful.
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
[+/-] |
A Dowd Valentine: Obama, Legally Blonde? |
By Maureen Dowd
IOWA FALLS -- Barack Obama looked as if he needed a smoke and he needed it bad.
Everyone knows you’re not supposed to make two big changes at once. But Michelle Obama’s price for letting her husband run was that he quit.
So there he was, trying to meet the deep, inexhaustible needs of both Iowa activists and the global press behemoth on his first swing across the state, while giving up cigarettes.
He was a tad testy. Traipsing around desolate stretches of snowy — and extremely white — Iowa to go into living rooms and high school gyms and take questions like “Are you willing to stand up for independent family farmers?” makes me want to sneak out for a drag, too, and I don’t even smoke.
“I’ve been chewing Nicorette all day long,” he told reporters at a press conference in Ames on Sunday, where he was getting irritated at suggestions that he lacked substance and at the specter of his vanishing privacy. And, oh yes, at the accusation by the Australian prime minister (sounding two sheep short of a paddock) that Mr. Obama’s deadline to get out of Iraq made him Al Qaeda’s dream candidate.
The Illinois senator didn’t have on an implacable mask of amiability, as Hillary did in Iowa. He didn’t look happily in his element, like Bill Clinton. But he certainly didn’t look as if he was straining to survive the Q .& A.’s, as W. did in the beginning.
Beyond his smooth-jazz façade, the reassuring baritone and that ensorcelling smile, the 45-year-old had moments of looking conflicted.
In the lobby of the AmericInn in Iowa Falls on Saturday night, he seemed a bit dazed by his baptism into the big-time. He was left munching trail mix all day while, he said, “the press got fed before me.”
Everything was a revelation for him: The advance team acronym RON, for Rest Overnight. Women squealing. “I saw a hat,” he noted with a grin, “that said, ‘Obama, clean and articulate.’ ”
Senator Obama’s body language was loose — and he’s so slender his wedding band looked as if it was slipping off — but there was a wariness in his dark eyes.
He is backed up by a strong, smart wife and a professional campaign team, but he doesn’t have a do-whatever-it-takes family firm with contract killers and debt collectors, like Bush Inc. and Clinton Inc.
He was eloquent, if not as inspiring as his advance billing had prepared audiences to expect. He made his first Swift-boat-able slip when he had to apologize for talking about soldiers’ lives “wasted” in Iraq. He sounded self-consciously pristine at times, as if he was too refined for the muck of politics. That’s not how you beat anybody but Alan Keyes.
After talking to high school journalists, he took a sniffy shot at the loutish reporters who were merely whispering where’s the beef: “Take some notes, guys, that’s how it’s done.”
No fewer than three times last week, Mr. Obama got indignant about the beach-babe attention given to a shot of him in the Hawaiian surf.
Using the dreaded third person that some candidates slip into, he told the press that one of their favorite narratives boiled down to “Obama has pretty good style, he can deliver a pretty good speech, but he seems to prioritize rhetoric over substance.” After an ode to his own specificity, he tut-tutted, “You’ve been reporting on how I look in a swimsuit.”
He poses for the cover of Men’s Vogue and then gets huffy when people don’t treat him as Hannah Arendt.
For some of us, it’s hard to fathom being upset at getting accused of looking great in a bathing suit. But his friends say it played into this Harvard grad’s fear of being seen as “a dumb blond.” He has been known to privately mock “pretty boys” (read John Edwards, the Breck Girl of 2004).
He doesn’t lack confidence, but he’s so hung up on being seen as thoughtful that he sometimes comes across as too emotionally detached and cerebral with crowds yearning for an electric, visceral connection. J.F.K. mixed cool with fire.
For a man who couldn’t wait to inject himself into the national arena, and who has spent so much time writing books about himself, the senator is oddly put off by press inquisitiveness.
When The Times’s Jeff Zeleny asked him on his plane whether he’d had a heater in his podium during his announcement speech in subzero Springfield, Mr. Obama hesitated. He shot Jeff a look that said, “Are you from People magazine?” before conceding that, unlike Abe Lincoln, he’d had a heater.
Take some notes, senator, that’s how it’s done.
[+/-] |
But it's finger lickin' good |
Though I have no idea why it ended up in my inbox, except to demonstrate that the gmail spam filters are human after all, I must say these are the most compelling paragraphs I've read all day:
Looking for that perfect Valentine's Day dinner plan? Many lovebirds say that a quiet night at home enjoying good (and simple) food like KFC ranked higher than a night out at a fancy restaurant as the ideal date. The KFC "Valentine's Dining and Dating Poll" of more than 300,000 men and women revealed that six in 10 respondents thought a quiet night at home was the way to go.Sure, I'd insist on a background check first, but I want to meet this guy (and/or gal as the case may be), the one who reads that suggestion and reacts with an enthusiastic "Yes! I will bring home a big bucket of greasy, discount chicken and call it romance. Thank you, KFC, for bailing me out again!" I'm not sure he and/or she exists, but if he and/ or she does I would love to spend two minutes with him and/or her to hear the answer to the obvious yet burning question: "What are you thinking?!"
If you've been stressing about Valentine's Day dinner reservations, stop by KFC for a bucket of the Colonel's Original Recipe Chicken.
I realize it's possible someone (Tavin, for instance) has a legitimate Valentine reason for going through the KFC drive thru tomorrow; truth be told, the first meal I ever shared with man I eventually married was White Castle, and at some point a reprise of that bad fast food probably would have seemed sweet. But, otherwise, even I, who refuse to be too beholden to the Hallmark/Valentine's Day machine, am pretty sure bad fast food inspired by corporate junk mail never says I love you. "See you tomorrow, after the Immodium kicks in": yes. "Happy Valentine's Day": no.
Monday, February 12, 2007
[+/-] |
Bless the Dixie Chicks, baby Jesus |
A triumphant Natalie Maines said "I'm ready to make nice" after collecting the Dixie Chicks' fifth Grammy last night. She damn well better not be.
"Not Ready to Make Nice" alone prompted me to buy my first "country" CD since, well, ever. (I'm not old school enough to have an album collection, but I do still buy "records" and wish more people did. My thoughts on the sorry state of the music industry, and consumers' culpability in it, will have to wait for another day.)
No song this year -- not even Weird Al's "White and Nerdy" -- approached the Chicks' defiant anthem for crank-up-the-volume play in my SUV. (Come to think of it, it might explain why my speakers are shot.)
I'm a huge fan of the mad-as-hell-and-not-gonna-take-it-anymore genre. I also liked the CD's title song, "Taking the Long Way."
In their honor, I may just play them both during timeouts of the next basketball game I announce. All the better that it will be Valentine's Day.
"Not Ready to Make Nice" was most deserving of "song of the year" honors. I have a bit of a beef, however, in the "best rock album" category.
Nothing against Red Hot Chili Peppers, which won with "Stadium Arcadium," but Tom Petty's "Highway Companion" was the best musical purchase I made all year. I loved Neil Young's "Living With War" too, for reasons stated previously, but Petty rocked my world.
He always has, but this was special. At my umpteenth Petty concert, with no less a warm-up band than Metallica, I stood shoulder-to-shoulder with my son at his first rock concert.
Petty didn't win the Grammy, but he presided over an important father-son experience. I didn't even mind that Zach preferred Metallica. What teenager wouldn't? But as I think back to seeing the Doobie Brothers with my eldest sister probably 30 years ago, I know he will always remember his first concert. And I cherish him as my "Highway Companion."
Sunday, February 11, 2007
[+/-] |
Lady and Gentlemen, start your engines |
The race is on in Iowa.
Barack Obama came to town today after announcing his candidacy for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination in Springfield, Ill. I'm sorry I missed it. Just as I'm sorry to have missed Hillary Clinton's visit last week, although I wasn't invited to that one.
Hillary met with as many people they could crowd into a living room -- fire marshals excluded. Barack packed a high school gymnasium, but promised more intimate visits once the novelty wears off.
It's an interesting phenomena this attention Iowa gets for hosting the nation's first presidential litmus test. I'm not sure it's fair, but I'm not complaining either.
In this election particularly -- where we have a "clean" slate and an unprecedented opportunity to change the course of history -- Democratic candidates will roll through town with regularity in the coming months. Republican candidates will come too, but they're irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.
I'm hoping to meet them all, or at least see them in person, before making a commitment. I was encouraged to hear reports from friends attending Barack's appearance today that he took unfiltered questions from an unfiltered audience. What a concept!
I confess an early attraction to John Edwards, if only for his refreshing ability to admit mistakes, and continue to hold a candle for Al Gore, but I'm undecided. I'm not sure why former governor Tom Vilsack is in the race, but maybe familiarity breeds contempt and he'll score better in New Hampshire and Nevada than Iowa.
Barack's critics usually point to his relative lack of a track record. I dismiss this as political straw grasping. After all, what did we know about W before he stole the presidency -- other than the fact that he was a loser in every venture he had ventured?
"My experience, not only as a U.S. senator, but as a state legislator, a civil rights lawyer, as a professor, as a community organizer, I think that mix of experience allows me, maybe, to speak to people in ways they can identify with, and I think that's part of the reasons we're generating such a good response," Obama told the Cedar Rapids Gazette.
Perhaps so. But, ultimately, all of the candidates will have to talk about where they stand and not how they think they're perceived. Never a fan of single-issue voting, my choice won't be based on Iraq. That's Bush's cross to bear.
Saturday, February 10, 2007
[+/-] |
Critical thinking in Ohio |
Although I'm hoping to make it through the rest of the winter without another one, I stand by my claim that there is no day like a snow day. And so, despite the fact that they must not be the sharpest crayons in the box, I almost have to give these soon-to-be-expelled girls credit for trying to make their own:
My favorite line may just be an administrator trying to be good copy for the local paper, but I prefer to interpret it as yet another illustration of the brilliant minds guiding our nation's schools:
Students Charged in Online Snow-Day Hoax
Feb 10, 6:04 PM (ET)
TRENTON, Ohio (AP) - Two teenage girls posted a fake announcement on their school district's Web site that said school was closed for the day due to winter weather, police said.
The notice, posted Monday, confused many parents - snow was not in the forecast - and persuaded some students to stay home.
Edgewood City Schools Superintendent Tom York said he discovered the posting when he logged on to write his own announcement that school would be delayed for an hour because of an extreme cold snap.
"I didn't make that call, and I'm the guy who does, so I knew something was up," York said.
If he's capable of that kind of incisive analysis, maybe the Cedar Rapids district should call him in to consult.
Thursday, February 08, 2007
[+/-] |
Dowd: This One’s for You, Joe |
By Maureen Dowd
It’s not double jeopardy exactly, but still, I’d prefer not to kill the same man twice.
And I wanted to follow William Safire’s advice on writing about gaffes and graft: Only kick people when they’re up, not when they’re down.
So I decided to do something completely radical and not pile on.
Having played a role in derailing Joe Biden’s ’88 presidential bid with stories on his overreliance on the speeches of Neil Kinnock and Bobby Kennedy, I feel compelled, now that the guy has slipped on another presidential banana peel 20 years later, to lend him a hand.
I wanted to give him a chance to wipe the slate clean and articulate his positions — without dredging up any painful memories of the words “clean” and “articulate.”
The senator called me between New York fund-raisers last night. After his rough week, he sounded a bit chastened, not at all in the mood for a columnist’s probing questions. He needn’t have feared.
“So,” I asked him sweetly, “why has everyone been so mean to you?”
“Well,” he demurred, “they haven’t been mean. The truth is, a lot of people in the African-American community were hurt by what I said. I really feel lousy about it. I got involved in politics because of civil rights.” (He said a lot more, but hey, it’s a 750-word column.) I had another penetrating question ready: “Is Delaware big enough to launch a president?” “I think it is,” he replied.
I had a tough follow-up: “Will your first act as president be to get rid of those tollbooths on I-95?” He laughed. “I get asked that a lot by people. I can’t help ’em — they’re on their own.”
That’s the straight talk I like to see. No pandering, like Hillary’s telling Iowans she likes ethanol, and John McCain’s telling Christian conservatives he likes Christian conservatives.
“People don’t seem to appreciate your verbal generosity,” I said. “Are you studying Bogie and Steve McQueen movies to become less wordy, or do you just hope people will come to see it as part of your charm?” “We’re in a political culture where everything is reduced to bumper stickers and sound bites, and it’s a lot more complicated than that,” he said. “I’m fairly candid, and sometimes I’ll cause controversy and sometimes I won’t. It’s who I am. I’m not going to change who I am.”
That’s my man. He stares controversy in the eye and chats with it.
“In one sentence, with no more than two dependent clauses,” I instruct, “tell me why you would make a great president.”
“I really believe the American people get the fact that with the next president, there’s no margin for error. He’s going to inherit a world and a nation where this guy is going to leave him in a real deep hole. The next president has to get us out of Iraq without ruining the Middle East, so Americans should be looking for the person with the most experience.”
O.K., that’s three sentences, but who’s counting?
“You’ve been a truth-teller on Iraq for years, so tell the truth,” I said. “Are we cooked?” Citing the soft-partition plan he co-wrote, he noted: “Any country that comes into being as a consequence of the pen of a diplomat has never been able to be stable except by (a) an imperial power dominating it, (b) a dictator or strongman, or (c) a federal system.”
Aren’t Americans going to be angry at a Senate that’s bending itself into a procedural pretzel, rather than seriously tackling the future of Iraq?
“They are going to be angry,” he agreed. “Republicans are trying to avoid embarrassing the president. If you took a secret ballot, I’d be dumbfounded if 20 senators thought sending 21,500 troops made any sense.” He said John McCain wouldn’t think it made sense either “because he has called for sending many more.”
Do you agree that Dick Cheney is barking mad?
“Cheney is a very smart guy who’s kicking the can down the road here,” he replied. “He’s concluded that this administration’s policy can’t succeed in Iraq and he’s handing it off to the next guy.”
Things were getting way too serious. “What’s your ideal day?”
“It would be corny,” he said. “Just taking off to the beach with Jill.”
Trying to boost his dented confidence, I said I was sure he looked better in the Delaware waves than Barack Obama in the Hawaiian surf. The 64-year-old laughed, saying, “Like the Paul McCartney song, ‘When I’m 64.’ I don’t look as good as I once did, but Jill does.”
“Who would make the best president?” I coaxed.
“Me,” he crowed.
I think his confidence is coming back. Excellent.
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
[+/-] |
White Like Me |
So I’m in front of my class, and the mood is light, and things seem to be moving along--until one question and then another suggest that we may be back at square one after all. To catch their attention and diffuse my frustration I let my explanation out--again--- in an exaggerated, teasing, tumble that's far from my usual teacher talk.
"Wow," says a voice from the back row, amazed. "You sound just like a white girl."
“Did you ever notice,” I say, “that I am a white girl?”
And they all laugh, partly at me calling myself "girl," but partly at the thought of me being white. It’s not that there’s any question about my ethnicity, it’s just that they don’t lump me in with most of the white people in their lives. I’m the trusted English teacher they've known in fact or by reputation for years, the one who has helped them decipher traffic tickets and leases, buy lunch, pass Algebra, and understand the United States (a real chore in recent years). In their eyes, those actions don’t make me a credit to White People, they separate me (and anyone else who has treated them well) from the White People. "We forget," another Mexican student says, "that you're not one of us." I take that as a compliment, but given the impression that basic human kindness makes, it doesn't say much for the White People. Nonetheless, these kids aren't the only ones who cling to their stereotypes and prejudices and make exceptions one individual at a time.
Take someone who, at least on appearances, my students would quickly judge as a really White Guy. Joe Biden's description of Barack Obama as the “first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,'' may be last week's news, but it still boggles my mind. It's hard to believe that thirty years in public life has not taught Biden to think before he speaks, but, then again, should it really take an extra effort to not say that? Only, perhaps, if he perceives Obama to be different than most African-American men. Or, in other words, not really black. Given Obama's popularity, I'd hazard a guess that it's a not uncommon sentiment, a notion that Leonard Pitts (whose newspaper, hallelujah, does not keep him behind a pay-per-read firewall) discussed in a recent column.
"Meantime," Pitts concludes, "I've got two words of advice for those folks who are surprised to learn Barack Obama is black:
Eye. Doctor."
Can't really argue with that, except that it's not really that simple. Too often, one first notices the skin color, and then one judges the actions. When they don't fit the stereotyped mold, our first impulse doesn't seem to be to break the mold but to build a new one. We're more comfortable putting people into groups than admitting that those groups may be flawed or, heaven forbid, unnecessary. Those habits, dear reader of undetermined race or ethnicity, don't exactly fill me with hope. On the other hand, the senior senator from the great state of Delaware has something important in common with a bunch of Mexican teenagers in Missouri. Maybe in some strange way we're all more integrated than we know.
[+/-] |
Tom Sawyer stays in school – optionally |
Local school administrators have clarified their stance on “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer.”
After spending “about” $6,700 (originally reported as $5,000) for 750 copies of the Mark Twain classic for each of the district’s eighth graders and subsequently deciding it wasn’t appropriate as required reading material, they’ve graciously given teachers up to the task the green light to engage their students in issues of language and racial stereotype that the book invokes.
Meanwhile, teachers who shy from such incendiary issues were given a pass.
I guess here in Cedar Rapids, it’s ok if some children are left behind. Except, as a wise friend of mine noted, Tom Sawyer is not on the test.
According to the Gazette, “A committee will be formed to make sure the process used to identify instructional materials, including an all-class novel, aligns with district policy. It will include a language arts teacher from each secondary building and others, such as administrators and special education teachers. Community input also will be sought.”
Such is the state of education in America.
God save our kids.
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
[+/-] |
Plausible Deniability. Or not. |
Today we see again how nothing gets a wingnut's knickers in a twist like homosexuality. Ted Haggard, the Evangelical leader who made the news last fall when he was outed by a male prostitute, is back in the headlines, but only so his former colleagues can quickly declare him "cured" and hustle him out of state as part of the Closeted Christian Relocation Program.
"He is completely heterosexual,'' said a Revered Tim Ralph, one of the ministers who counseled Haggard. ''That is something he discovered. It was the acting-out situations where things took place. It wasn't a constant thing.'' Besides, Ralph would have added if only I'd been writing his prepared comments, Haggard doesn't even like Snickers, and all right-thinking people know it really doesn't satisfy.
I'm not exactly sure what "acting-out situations where things took place" is supposed to mean, but a literal take on the phrase "ignore the man behind the curtain" does come to mind. In a related story, Ralph is working with a woman who is a little bit pregnant.
Forgiveness and damage control probably look much the same in this situation, so I suppose I should give Haggard's fellow ministers and the rest of that community the benefit of the doubt. It does strike me, however, that those who have so little interest in examining Haggard's character have so much interest in explaining his predilections. Once again, the specter of homosexuality trumps all. It doesn't matter that he lied about what he did as long as he didn't like doing it.
Meanwhile, Haggard and his wife have declared their intentions to move to either Iowa or Missouri and study--of all things-- psychology. I'd be curious to know what they learn.
Saturday, February 03, 2007
[+/-] |
Greed, Inc. |
The world being such a big, bad place, it's a real comfort to know that I can count on others to look out for me and the rest of the little people. Others, for instance, like the giant multi-state power utility that, most of the time, supplies our electricity.
Why, just this week I received a letter from them explaining their new "Customer Elect Plan." Once I stopped laughing at their professed "commitment to safety, service and the seamless delivery of power to [my] home," I learned that Ameren has figured out a way for their customers who are just scraping by to afford both power and food despite the newly jacked up electric rates-- at least until 2010.
What is the Customer Elect Plan? Why, it's an opportunity to pay interest on one's power bill! If that's not America, I don't know what is, but it did remind me of Stephen Colbert's take on Bush's SOTU health care-tax break "plan":
"It's so simple. Most people who couldn't afford health insurance also are too poor to owe taxes. But...if you give them a deduction from their taxes they don't owe, they can use the money they're not getting back from what they haven't given to buy the health care they can't afford."
With Ameren's plan, customers' bills will "only" increase 14 percent each year through 2009. The rest of the increase (which will far exceed 14 percent) will be deferred and accrue interest at a rate of 3.25 percent. Starting in 2010, those customers will pay 100 percent of their current bill, plus the portion of the previous bills they never paid, plus interest, for 36 months. So, don't pay what you can't afford now so you can really not afford it later. Priceless!
Around here, people may not always have electricity, and they may not always be able to afford it when they do, but at least they'll always have Ameren's goodwill to keep them warm.
Friday, February 02, 2007
[+/-] |
Groundhog Day |
Punxsutawney Phil’s big day arrives, and I find myself repeating a common practice – ranting to the local newspaper about some perceived injustice. This time, again, I’m certain I’m right.
At issue is Mark Twain’s classic American tale, “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer,” and whether it’s appropriate reading material for eighth graders. After spending $5,000 for copies for each of the district’s eighth graders, administrators determined the book’s language and racial issues were inappropriate for middle school students.
Rather, administrators determined teachers were incapable of dealing with such issues as racial identity and name-calling. The book, they smugly noted, was available for students to check out from the library.
Quite coincidentally, except it’s not, the district is asking voters to approve a 10-year, 1-cent local option tax. This wrong-headed decision won’t help their cause.
But that’s not all that today brought. First, Punxsutawney Phil didn’t see his shadow, foretelling winter’s imminent end. With temperatures hovering around zero – and wind chills well below – in my neck of the woods, spring can’t come soon enough.
My soul was warmed by mid-morning with the news that Brett Favre would return for another year as quarterback of the Green Bay Packers. While some contend Favre’s skills have diminished, he’s still one of the top 10 quarterbacks in the NFL and, week after week, gives the Packers the best chance of victory.
I’m pleased that, at least prospectively, my final memory of Favre won’t be of him fumbling victory away against St. Louis. But it’s fitting that his decision was announced on Groundhog Day, since retirement watch has become an annual ritual for Packer fans.
To complete the day, Mediacom and Sinclair Browbeating Group reached an agreement that restored CBS broadcasting for local cable subscribers. With Super Bowl Sunday on the horizon, the timing is ideal – if not predictable.
As I write this, I’m watching Letterman for the first time in weeks – without the aid of rabbit ears. Financial terms of the agreement – which extends through 2009 – were not disclosed, but Mediacom will carry through on its promise to hand out 10,000 frozen pizzas to customers in Cedar Rapids and Waterloo.
The pizzas are “free,” and if you believe that, you believe a groundhog in Pennsylvania can determine how long winter will last in Iowa.
Thursday, February 01, 2007
[+/-] |
They're Multiplying (what else could they do?) |
When evaluating hermaphrodite deer stories, one must weigh several criteria: was the deer in Wisconsin? did it have seven legs? and, most importantly, did anyone eat it? By those standards, this story is pretty weak. Nonetheless, I'm pretty sure that the open thread bylaws require me to post it. After all, hermaphrodite deer!
Florida Hunter Bags a Hermaphrodite Deer
Tallahassee, Fla. (AP) --
A DeBary man who was out hunting deer last fall got a big surprise when he took one of his deer into the check station.
Joe Stokes was deer hunting on public land in Sumter County on Nov. 12 and shot two deer, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission reported.
When FWC senior wildlife technician Tim Farley logged in the deer, he discovered that one deer was a hermaphrodite, possessing both male and female reproductive organs. Farley also he logged in another hermaphrodite deer the day before.
"I've been doing this for 27 years, and I've only come across three deer that were 'true' hermaphrodites, those having all of the male and female sex organs," Farley said in a statement.
Robert Vanderhoof, the deer management coordinator for the FWC, said deer that are true hermaphrodites are extremely rare.